@jamesgheys1 @mjaztwit Are these the references you had in mind? https://t.co/E6o6qCMOhs https://t.co/hWYQCoCkPy
"A good behavioural account is the very best thing you can do for the physiologist"... resonates with the "Neuroscience needs Behaviour" paper in Neuron a few years back, a bit sad that this needs to be reiterated 50 years or so after Skinner. https://t.co
This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias; 2017; Krakauer JW, Ghazanfar AA, Gomez-Marin A, MacIver MA, Poeppel D. Neuron 93:480-490. https://t.co/
@AbigailARusso https://t.co/RgMFh13fw7 this one usually creates fun discussions. Don't know if it's relevant to your course though?
@Cognomada @Lepisma_Sacchar Es este. Causó cierto revuelo. Luego hicieron un número especial en Neuron: Behavior Metters. Te recomiendo también ver ese número, especialmente The Life of Behavior de Gomez-Marin. https://t.co/xEJX5rSOJW
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
RT @davidpoeppel: If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKd…
If interested in the arguments that G Buzsaki, @fedeadolfi & I are bouncing around on brain & behavior https://t.co/U5EKdkV4ZV, be sure to also (re)read the perspective that @blamlab @behaviOrganisms @malcolmmaciver asif ghazanfar and I published
RT @fedeadolfi: D) That cognitive neuroscience can be freed from philosophical assumptions. Here we had our task made easier by work from @…
D) That cognitive neuroscience can be freed from philosophical assumptions. Here we had our task made easier by work from @blamlab and and colleagues. https://t.co/K0m9X2amS2 https://t.co/aSoO0UyHkl
@george_owens @IreneFPinto @lidacboom @edgar8_24 @Neurathena Como dirían Bunge y Ardila 'definamos aprendizaje'. Otro debate es posible también y agradezco el hilo, muy interesante todo lo que habéis puesto. Que tengáis un buen fin de semana. https://t.co/
@drderekd @TReyeslab Oh & required reading in my course. I may be grumpy too after hearing same comment. https://t.co/p90sL9qydV
@PessoaBrain The state of the Art reviews for me about how neuroscience has been just neglecting behavior are https://t.co/yckBiYV6xt And https://t.co/wxlxhHVPQo
RT @pooneil: もうひとつのネタ元はKrakauer et al Neuron 2017 "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" https://t.co/piVnqkH9P9 なんだ…
もうひとつのネタ元はKrakauer et al Neuron 2017 "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" https://t.co/piVnqkH9P9 なんだけど、つい先日@shokou5 さんが言及してたここで、神経科学者が使う脳の操作で行動への介入ができることは、マーの意味ではhttps://t.co/Oz51MHwiIg
RT @katzkagaya: 「記述」の価値をもっと高めたい。生物学なら記述、整理が本務だし、HHモデルだって「記述」として発表された。 https://t.co/XLikNBD6ay
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @katzkagaya: 「記述」の価値をもっと高めたい。生物学なら記述、整理が本務だし、HHモデルだって「記述」として発表された。
RT @katzkagaya: 「記述」の価値をもっと高めたい。生物学なら記述、整理が本務だし、HHモデルだって「記述」として発表された。 https://t.co/XLikNBD6ay
RT @katzkagaya: 「記述」の価値をもっと高めたい。生物学なら記述、整理が本務だし、HHモデルだって「記述」として発表された。
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @katzkagaya: 「記述」の価値をもっと高めたい。生物学なら記述、整理が本務だし、HHモデルだって「記述」として発表された。
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
「記述」の価値をもっと高めたい。生物学なら記述、整理が本務だし、HHモデルだって「記述」として発表された。
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は,それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ" "埋め草用語[…]は,回路と行動の間のマッピングのための明示的な概念枠組みがないことを示す" https://t.co/Z1UYNoWFr0
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
nice 'reminder' from Krakauer (@blamlab) @davidpoeppel et al. 'behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality'
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neuroscience" Great paper by Krakauer and Poeppel: Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 2016. https:/
@JotDownSpain 2. De hecho, no hay evidencia de q los animales entiendan lo que están viendo gracias a este supuesto tipo de neuronas. Solo hay evidencia de que la neurona X está correlacionada con algo que el experimentador cree que es importante para el s
RT @JAlGallego: @artcollisions @JonAMichaels @caitvw @Neurotweeps I'd also add that their existence is highly debated (even from a function…
@joe_dewhurst @NeuroYogacara Thanks for your interest. This is appearing soon in eNeuro: AGAINST THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PRIMACY OF THE HARDWARE: THE BRAIN FROM INSIDE OUT-TURNED UPSIDE DOWN. In the meantime, Krakauer et al. already articulates this stuff: htt
@artcollisions @JonAMichaels @caitvw @Neurotweeps I'd also add that their existence is highly debated (even from a functional perspective) to put it mildly. I like how @blamlab @behaviOrganisms et al put it here https://t.co/PHGmAQ8ews https://t.co/Obvrvjn
@Gibilloarrate Bueno, las conexiones podrían ser estáticas. ;) Pero sí, aparte de eso, la neurociencia ha empezado recientemente a volverse más dinámica, a mirar al cerebro teniendo en cuenta lo que sucede a su alrededor. El terremoto fue este paper: http
“Why neuroscience needs behavior” by Krakauer, Ghazanfar, Gomez-Marin, MacIver, @davidpoeppel https://t.co/vCk98pHgqJ
@JulioMTNeuro @bradpwyble @dileeplearning @TvanKerkoerle It sounds like you both agree- I think Brad is getting at the point that to better understand neural activity we need to better understand the behaviour it (maybe) produces. A la https://t.co/ypOMl6a
Even in the age dataism and gazillion teslas MRI's, neuroscience still needs behavior https://t.co/5na1Q23MeO and of course https://t.co/Bw7tyMstzf
RT @AldoHouterman: @BobVermeeren @NeilOConnell @MH_DK @edwinderaaij @head_like_egg @giacomocart2014 @Retlouping 'Why neuroscience needs beh…
@BobVermeeren @NeilOConnell @MH_DK @edwinderaaij @head_like_egg @giacomocart2014 @Retlouping 'Why neuroscience needs behavior' From: https://t.co/sBReVktYp3 https://t.co/hMq5PL0R4o
RT @EgorAnanyev: Great illustration of Marr's 3 Levels of Analysis from Krakauer et al.'s review on why #neuroscience needs behavior https:…
RT @tgup_in_the_lab: I read this paper today as part of preparing for my qualifying exams, and I found it to be simultaneously enlightening…
I read this paper today as part of preparing for my qualifying exams, and I found it to be simultaneously enlightening and reassuring. https://t.co/topj5K9tTv
RT @pierre_vanmedge: #ABIM2020 and here is a review summarizing Poeppel et al.'s ideas on why a principled approach to neuroscience is usef…
#ABIM2020 and here is a review summarizing Poeppel et al.'s ideas on why a principled approach to neuroscience is useful and necessary: https://t.co/T4mVf3fvV7
@joeyginorio @tyrell_turing @o_guest When thinking about the issue of multiple realizability, from a computational theory perspective, I’ve found this article rather illuminating https://t.co/ZsK2nXkTK1
Also @blamlab has a great paper more geared towards neuroscientists but I think it would also be useful for ML community! I highly recommend reading it https://t.co/ZwKdTSi8VS
@hkhanirl @JoeNanbu @mmt_lvt @EPoe187 @AdamRutherford AnY SciEnCe I don'T LiKe Is Pseudoscience, yeah let's just ignore mountains of meta-analyses and cling to muh blank-slatism and critical theory! (actual pseudoscience) Precious. 😂 https://t.co/ygurpcVgQ
RT @HeathRossie: これは "Neuroscience needs behavior" の精神的続編な展望論文 https://t.co/iBcDZEe5Q5
これは "Neuroscience needs behavior" の精神的続編な展望論文 https://t.co/iBcDZEe5Q5
@artoo_arturo Creo que mejor deberías leer este artículo (con cara de desaprobación): https://t.co/p20SaWX5co
RT @WiringTheBrain: Pair that with: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. https://t.co/jLgmDC5ysE
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. Por qué la neurofisiología (y la neurociencia en general) necesita de la ciencia de la conducta si queremos llegar a comprender y explicar el comportamiento. https://t.co/OZk9LjJSie
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/aeucFVYmHR #science #research #neuroscience
Behaviour doesn't need neural data to make sense. Neural data serve to explain how the NS can give rise to behavioural patterns. In its logics behaviour is self-explanatory. Its physical implementation is not - this is where neural data come in https://t.c
This argument could be made of disease vs immunology: “In most cases ... study of the neural implementation of behavior is best investigated *after* ... behavioral work. Behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality.”
A really well written review. It's unfortunate that I didn't come across this earlier. https://t.co/ZKDgvvfBS4
RT @davidpoeppel: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" by Krakauer Ghazanfar Gomez-Marin MacIver Poeppel https://…
Evergreen: "'Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We are scientists, not philosophers!’ The answer to this is simple: there is no escape from philosophy." https://t.co/zTJC
RT @manuelbaltieri: For anyone wondering about the seagull, well, it's my (Brightonian) way to relate to one of my fav recent papers and th…
RT @manuelbaltieri: For anyone wondering about the seagull, well, it's my (Brightonian) way to relate to one of my fav recent papers and th…
RT @manuelbaltieri: For anyone wondering about the seagull, well, it's my (Brightonian) way to relate to one of my fav recent papers and th…
For anyone wondering about the seagull, well, it's my (Brightonian) way to relate to one of my fav recent papers and their example of Marr's levels of analysis: https://t.co/DGsPEsYeHg by @blamlab’s John Krakauer, Asif Ghazanfar, @behaviOrganisms, @malcol
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias - ScienceDirect https://t.co/bKdk6N5hdn
I have asked a question myself: is that the real bottleneck in the bandwidth is in behaviour?Should we sample better behaviour during brain experiments rather than just focusing on stimulus<->brain (or brain<->brain) relationships? Yes this was
RT @martisamuser: @davidpoeppel argued for a push towards thinking about hypotheses that would link representational/conceptual details of…