we need behaviour to guide other analysis. to understand in first hand what’s going on. can we only look at the black box and forget its output? https://t.co/AdOgoczW8Z
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/bmeye0j49F
RT @TheFrontalLobe_: I never tire of this: "Neuroscience needs behaviour: correcting a reductionist bias" https://t.co/lKjSbtrBPO Thinking…
I never tire of this: "Neuroscience needs behaviour: correcting a reductionist bias" https://t.co/lKjSbtrBPO Thinking a lot lately about ultra-thorough in-depth characterisation and explanation of individual behaviour, as opposed to high-n group average q
Agree: 👉Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. https://t.co/pKUO05dzCC
@mwalibali This might not be explicitly developmental enough for your purposes, but the general approach fits the bill. I wish more neuroscientists embraced this view! https://t.co/6QPeWgAFFJ
RT @neuroecology: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias [by @behaviOrganisms, @blamlab, @davidpoeppel] https://t.co/R…
RT @gonschorek_d: “Neuroscience needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias” is one of my favorite papers so far since it makes an impor…
“Neuroscience needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias” is one of my favorite papers so far since it makes an important statement. If you haven’t read it yet, give it a try. https://t.co/HoQVYuyeW6 #neuroscience #behavior
@stevenjluck There are many, empirical and theoretical, but this from Krakauer et al. 2017 is a big one as an integrative framework: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" https://t.co/eadBrk8lvv
@CultureByNumbrs @Russell_Clayton Ok, I read the paper. Good points & preliminary data. But I’d also say this is not a new problem. My intuition for how to solve it isn’t to go full on data driven. I’m a big fan of this paper; especially its appeals to
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/MTcHHUEnl6
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/2xeDU8fyUi
I like reminding myself that this paper exist: https://t.co/Ud3CmfNpiL!
@ItsNeuronal @lucylai_ @Ikuperwajs @jpillowtime @kendmil @mjaztwit @jtdudman @neuroecology @markdhumphries @SuryaGanguli Arbib's Handbook is useful too. Rieke et al's Spikes. I think exposure to the microprocessor paper is useful: https://t.co/S8SulKhwmT I
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @blamlab: Our provocation is out. Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/KSa89jGYFe
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @yadindudai: Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their r…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
Behavior should be at the top three. All other methods do not make much sense in brain research without considering their relevance to the ultimate in-vivo real-life output of the system. https://t.co/lwCSLCgzYS
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
What David said https://t.co/OHuXSBOrEO
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
RT @davidpoeppel: Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau htt…
Umm, I'll go with a major upset by "Behavior," ranked 16th. Neuroscience *needs* behavior :-) https://t.co/8bMHesiEau https://t.co/NK66CBOW7o
Interesting article. I suppose behaviour should move up from fig. 9 to be the actual motivation for neuronal studies. https://t.co/z6GMheRoQO
@gershbrain the question gets more complicated if we think about how unclear and imprecise the notion of behavior is in neuroscience... https://t.co/2dou6rPGJB what are we doing when we're trying to understand behavior by way of making inferences from beha
RT @FBpsy: La neurociencia necesita a la conducta: la investigación conductual nos da la comprensión, y las intervenciones a nivel neuronal…
RT @FBpsy: La neurociencia necesita a la conducta: la investigación conductual nos da la comprensión, y las intervenciones a nivel neuronal…
RT @FBpsy: La neurociencia necesita a la conducta: la investigación conductual nos da la comprensión, y las intervenciones a nivel neuronal…
La neurociencia necesita a la conducta: la investigación conductual nos da la comprensión, y las intervenciones a nivel neuronal sirven para probar causalidad. Primero va la conducta, luego lo demás. https://t.co/ipk6KhJpvw
(excellent questions that still don't have clear answers, here a recent paper I enjoyed reading https://t.co/n9lSODU8hH )
Appetizer: @davidpoeppel et al on why neuroscience needs cognitive science https://t.co/cYDVICZc0W 2/5
RT @mjsutterer: David Poeppel at #AAASmtg, neuroscience has reached an "epistemological ennui" with an "orgy of data" and little understand…
RT @mjsutterer: David Poeppel at #AAASmtg, neuroscience has reached an "epistemological ennui" with an "orgy of data" and little understand…
RT @mjsutterer: David Poeppel at #AAASmtg, neuroscience has reached an "epistemological ennui" with an "orgy of data" and little understand…
David Poeppel at #AAASmtg, neuroscience has reached an "epistemological ennui" with an "orgy of data" and little understanding. Greatest hits of the 2017 paper: https://t.co/UPecOXgSXy
RT @behaviOrganisms: 365 days since our "Neuroscience Needs Behaviour" piece, led by the great @blamlab, went live. Proud of it! https://t…
365 days since our "Neuroscience Needs Behaviour" piece, led by the great @blamlab, went live. Proud of it! https://t.co/rS7qlb6bIq
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @Timothy_Bussey: @markgbaxter @cawinstanley @brain_apps “It is as if every paper needs to be a methodological decathlon in order to be c…
RT @Timothy_Bussey: @markgbaxter @cawinstanley @brain_apps “It is as if every paper needs to be a methodological decathlon in order to be c…
@markgbaxter @cawinstanley @brain_apps “It is as if every paper needs to be a methodological decathlon in order to be considered important.” — @blamlab et al. (2016) https://t.co/8AHU7J8ZG2
@inneuroaestheti @alvanoe Great point. (2) is imo a bigger debate about #reductionism in #neuroscience. J.W. Krakauer @blamlab, @davidpoeppel et al. raised that point very clearly https://t.co/3uqQIEqqY2
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
"It took a long time for transistor finders and electrical engineers to understand each other's spirit." But I believe an understanding of microprocessor will become a prerequisite for neuroscientists and vice versa. https://t.co/YNyQmr0IsJ
RT @sterrett_sc: I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastici…
I've been wrangling with the recent paper from Krakauer and @davidpoeppel alongside work from @KordingLab and @stochastician as I set course in my PhD studies. Deeply sobering arguments that I advise all to read: https://t.co/h3sPVm8aIt https://t.co/tkloDH
@rhyolight @RebelScience @JeffCHawkins @Numenta I think this paper is definitely pointing out many of the weaknesses of this technology-driven research (better recordings, more neurones, etc.) https://t.co/ovAI4EcSCj
Ya por último. Dejo liga para artículo sobre reduccionismo biológico; incluye discusión sobre los alcances de la neurociencia y una propuesta de solución. https://t.co/UGlQPYs7VW https://t.co/wQfS2YzGt8
Interesting article for consideration. https://t.co/HQADuM6wpL
RT @GaabLab: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/d3t23wu9MB
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/RwWnxnAkPI
RT @GaabLab: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/d3t23wu9MB