RT @SergeAhmed: "Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We…
RT @Flagel_Lab: Behavioralists and non-behavioralists, my grant- and manuscript-reviewers, leaders who don't believe that behavior is actua…
RT @SergeAhmed: "Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We…
RT @SergeAhmed: "Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We…
RT @SergeAhmed: "Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We…
RT @SergeAhmed: "Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We…
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: Behavioralists and non-behavioralists, my grant- and manuscript-reviewers, leaders who don't believe that behavior is actua…
"Understanding something is not the same as just describing it or knowing how to intervene to change it.", Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. #MachineLearning https://t.co/JVGx5FHqyi https://t.co/156j5b7BqX
RT @Flagel_Lab: Behavioralists and non-behavioralists, my grant- and manuscript-reviewers, leaders who don't believe that behavior is actua…
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
Still true.
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
👇👇👇
RT @PeppeGanga: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/iE0KIgBawR
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/iE0KIgBawR
RT @Flagel_Lab: Behavioralists and non-behavioralists, my grant- and manuscript-reviewers, leaders who don't believe that behavior is actua…
RT @Flagel_Lab: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
RT @Flagel_Lab: Behavioralists and non-behavioralists, my grant- and manuscript-reviewers, leaders who don't believe that behavior is actua…
Behavioralists and non-behavioralists, my grant- and manuscript-reviewers, leaders who don't believe that behavior is actually neuroscience, all NEED to read this article. 1/
"Neuroscience Needs Behavior" https://t.co/OWg6hY7duC
"Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We are scientists, not philosophers!" The answer to this is simple: there is no escape from philosophy. https://t.co/wuZkDpvcFp
RT @fedsanabria: @matthewcbellphd @JR_Kantor I read it more like this: https://t.co/D6tQQgQtKW
@matthewcbellphd @JR_Kantor I read it more like this: https://t.co/D6tQQgQtKW
@PratYosef Just ran into this paper again and it's quite to this question, I think https://t.co/sx78ajT1MY
@personalitygeni @_fernando_rosas @eboychile Also the original comment I made was half-joking since there are still Skinnerians out there, and in some ways the cognitive revolution did not live up to its promise. Papers like this may represent a much-nee
@Lisette_dJH @DrRebeccaGordon @PsychScientists @richjallen Perhaps, then, rather than suggest that an individual has "high" or proficient WM, it may be best to say they do well on x or y or z task. We need better behavioral anchors to do good work on cogni
Why is it important to derive macro from micro? https://t.co/gc4gcQJdEU See @blamlab for another/different perspective from neuroscience https://t.co/Ozg3afq5aK 4/8 https://t.co/qBTuJERLmc
RT @RuudHortensius: Graphical abstract of 'Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias' finally published https://t.co/ElQ…
18) Krakauer et al. (2017). Data scientific methodological "habits" in neuroscience tend to overshadow some very important aspects of the subject matter at hand, behaviour and environment. https://t.co/asvTtvvbWv
errata: Krakauer et al. 2019 -> Krakauer et al. 2017 https://t.co/9WJfkW6zHy
@rmaruy 面白いまとめありがとうございます!左から2つめだなぁと思いながら論文DLしました。お正月に読んでみます。 全く本質ではないのですが、この左から2つめの論文は2017publishですかね?(version違いがあったりするのかもですが) https://t.co/viy8LYxHDj
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
@_fernando_rosas Weasel words :) - My personal list (collected in a single talk last year): https://t.co/AmggztIWVh - @KordingLab's discussion https://t.co/T0Luw2a40T And the ever so brilliant https://t.co/DVz8hB1W1C, by @blamlab, Ghazanfar, @behaviOrga
@parsamtwt @Vivamous_mori https://t.co/UV4RvBK3JH اینو اگه ندیدی یه نکاه بنداز، اون سه تا مرحلهی مار رو بجور. خیلیا میگن اصن شما تو آزمایشگاه هرکار کنی تهش به درد سگ نمیخوره چون «برا فهمیدن اینکه پرنده چجوری پرواز میکنه دارین پر رو زیر میکروسکوپ چک میکنین
RT @blamlab: I do not think any of us who wrote the article ever thought it would have the impact, especially on young scientists, that it…
Krakauer et al - Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting the reductionist bias https://t.co/Fk58NQwJBj Henry Yin - The crisis in neuroscience https://t.co/O8zetNpYRB Yael Niv - The primacy of behavioral research for understanding the brain https://t.co/vRB
RT @blamlab: I do not think any of us who wrote the article ever thought it would have the impact, especially on young scientists, that it…
RT @GraziosiSergio: I also remember the precise moment when things started to click together, and I suddenly began to make sense of my prev…
RT @blamlab: I do not think any of us who wrote the article ever thought it would have the impact, especially on young scientists, that it…
RT @blamlab: I do not think any of us who wrote the article ever thought it would have the impact, especially on young scientists, that it…
RT @GraziosiSergio: I also remember the precise moment when things started to click together, and I suddenly began to make sense of my prev…
RT @GraziosiSergio: I also remember the precise moment when things started to click together, and I suddenly began to make sense of my prev…
RT @GraziosiSergio: I also remember the precise moment when things started to click together, and I suddenly began to make sense of my prev…
RT @blamlab: I do not think any of us who wrote the article ever thought it would have the impact, especially on young scientists, that it…
RT @GraziosiSergio: I also remember the precise moment when things started to click together, and I suddenly began to make sense of my prev…
I do not think any of us who wrote the article ever thought it would have the impact, especially on young scientists, that it seems to have had. Speaking out is important in all things. Thanks for great thread @GraziosiSergio & to @behaviOrganisms @dav
RT @hangingnoodles: Mass Misbehaving Brain Science @blamlab reductio ad tech absurdum akin to Jump-To-The-Genes Mindset https://t.co/Whph…
Mass Misbehaving Brain Science @blamlab reductio ad tech absurdum akin to Jump-To-The-Genes Mindset https://t.co/Whphik0qN0 ht @WiringTheBrain
I also remember the precise moment when things started to click together, and I suddenly began to make sense of my previous (failed and short!) life as a researcher. It was when I read this paper by @blamlab: https://t.co/J1Fm8LAy4f 14/n
RT @shnakazawa: An important perspective to ask "how does the brain generate behavior" or "what is a mechanism for the behavior." | Neurosc…
An important perspective to ask "how does the brain generate behavior" or "what is a mechanism for the behavior." | Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/xqBBR0zYVF
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
RT @CarlosEAlvare17: This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior:…
高木さんブログやってたんだ。というか高木さんなんで教えてくれなかったんだろう泣
@chazfirestone Great line up of articles. Also relevant is work addressing "education neuroscience" https://t.co/srxa5OXd0g and https://t.co/FpbfWy12YA
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
Neuroscience needs behavior. This should be obvious but unfortunately it is not in the current method-oriented climate. Another good take on this issue from a few years ago: https://t.co/uPKAFA7AOt
interesting question: "Is neuroscience doomed to go round in circles?" seems still not a clear but Krakauer ( @blamlab ) et al. raised an interesting discussion with https://t.co/XOTefx5Vt8 more at https://t.co/1jVy6CJ9DM https://t.co/H01dlwj5LP
@RobinFondberg Har försökt att samla artklar på ämnet. Bästa hittills (förutom Jonas & Kording): https://t.co/Auz6doMBIL https://t.co/XrJv2STjko
"The least interesting thing about the mind is whether the brain is squishy or chewy" https://t.co/v0epVDMRrY
RT @LiisaGalea: @JulioMTNeuro @chazfirestone @yael_niv But sometimes the neural machinery is quite different in producing the same behaviou…
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
@JulioMTNeuro @chazfirestone @yael_niv But sometimes the neural machinery is quite different in producing the same behaviour in males versus females. As Krakauer said -understanding what the chess pieces are made off does not allow you to understand how th
RT @chazfirestone: This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoep…
This is (rightly) blowing up! For discussion of similar themes, check out https://t.co/64g6ZANbrH by @blamlab @davidpoeppel, and the surprisingly timeless https://t.co/8IX1I1kCYV. But this latest paper makes several new + different points than those earlie
@blamlab @criticalneuro @JCSkewesDK @bradpwyble @shengokai @IrisVanRooij @neuro_data @tyrell_turing @BernhardHommel @FelixHill84 @santoroAI Incidentally, cites @blamlab paper https://t.co/HA3i9C8vPY . So let's not dismiss the sensorimotorists because the
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
RT @kazuhi_s_: 再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/…
再来週の理研の脳科学塾では、神経科学には行動をうまく測る手法が不可欠だ、という話をする。KrakauerとKodingの論文は、何度読んでもめっちゃ勉強になる。そしてその界隈の話題をまとめた高木くんのブログがとても有用。 https://t.co/xNxImXqIYJ https://t.co/teVJTwn7cZ https://t.co/KV593GZ5oB
@bradpwyble @IceVisLab @neuromatch @TimKietzmann Classic plug time: Neuroscience needs behavior https://t.co/VgR9DUWlsZ
This was addressed nicely (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias; 2017; Krakauer JW, Ghazanfar AA, Gomez-Marin A, MacIver MA, Poeppel D. Neuron 93:480-490. https://t.co/FomRKZwKux
Just discovered this old paper on reductionism in neuroscience. There is a huge bias towards trying to break down scientific problems into units, rather than trying to understand them holistically. Really an incredible paper, even for non-neuroscientists.
Great article Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/RZEUJrpKtK
@twitemp1 I’m also reminded of this https://t.co/YRD7VMUDav
RT @CarlosEAlvare17: This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior:…