@davidpoeppel argued for a push towards thinking about hypotheses that would link representational/conceptual details of a mechanism to the implementational details by specifying algorithmic details. (see: the cool example of sound localization; https://t.
@joost_v_amersf I love this study. Such a punk mentality. Picked it up from this one which I also rate as a banger https://t.co/SBvdiXnJwo
(...) another equally important approach seeks an alternative form of understanding through careful theoretical and experimental decomposition of behavior (...) behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality. https://t.
研究会でこの話https://t.co/PJh6lv42ko
it‘s a balance. We went to „irrelevant“ paradigms in the hope to isolate building blocks of cognition. Nowadays, there‘s a strong move towards more ethologically valid paradigms. e.g. Krakauer et al https://t.co/9V8Ka70N9A
As argued in @blamlab et al: “Who cares what philosophers say about the differences between psychology and neuroscience, or reductionism in general? We are scientists, not philosophers!” The answer to this is simple: there is no escape from philosophy. htt
@PWGTennant Here's a start: https://t.co/pGyqnzFMBk
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/xzMC4V4KVb
RT @waterlego: "There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board with…
RT @rei_akaishi: Neuroscience needs behavior.. https://t.co/f23wmPw0Zl https://t.co/lzGVnWfNtO
RT @rei_akaishi: Neuroscience needs behavior.. https://t.co/f23wmPw0Zl https://t.co/lzGVnWfNtO
RT @rei_akaishi: Neuroscience needs behavior.. https://t.co/f23wmPw0Zl https://t.co/lzGVnWfNtO
RT @rei_akaishi: Neuroscience needs behavior.. https://t.co/f23wmPw0Zl https://t.co/lzGVnWfNtO
RT @rei_akaishi: Neuroscience needs behavior.. https://t.co/f23wmPw0Zl https://t.co/lzGVnWfNtO
Neuroscience needs behavior.. https://t.co/f23wmPw0Zl
Totally on the @gordpennycook train here
I am on board with neuroscience methods. I've run an EEG experiment. Have designs to get into fMRI at some point. But a strong field is diverse. And neuroscience needs behavior! (https://t.co/w0PixHYMp2). To me, this hiring trend is problematic
@kaymtye @tollkuhn @JasonSynaptic @AndrewHires How is it that the old work is hypothetical and the new work is fact? As pointed out here https://t.co/LCA481elbe and here https://t.co/Zcpn8aWY1z a lot of people don’t seem to think the state of things in n
THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM PHILOSOPHY! https://t.co/2FysjfaJlW
RT @aliboyle6: 'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
RT @aliboyle6: 'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @aliboyle6: 'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
RT @aliboyle6: 'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
RT @aliboyle6: 'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
RT @aliboyle6: 'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
'There is no escape from #philosophy.' Why #neuroscience needs #behaviour - https://t.co/A0Rw93CEVG https://t.co/BOILnmu1gv
@graemedmoffat @_rdgao @NeuroBill @MillerLabMIT I'm reminded of the complaints raised in this paper about "filler words" https://t.co/X15wcVC7CV . They weren't referring to oscillations work here, because of course this flaw can happen anywhere https://t.c
RT @waterlego: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/7BwPKSjJuo
RT @waterlego: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/7BwPKSjJuo
Intriguing insights from perspective piece in journal Cell. "...we advocate a more pluralistic notion of neuroscience when it comes to the brain-behavior relationship: behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality.":
RT @waterlego: "There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board with…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Why neuroscience (still) needs behavior - hear hear! https://t.co/aBKmMtFm5V by @blamlab @davidpoeppel et al
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @twersh: A lovely paper. https://t.co/7hEtEewGQ4
A lovely paper.
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
A nice piece of work: behaviour needs not just causal evidence but direct links to neurons and importantly networks. https://t.co/9ig8hymN2C
RT @MyCuppaJo: Sharing a second time today because I really like this paper and want someone else to read it so we can talk about it. "Neur…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @waterlego: "There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board with…
RT @waterlego: "There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board with…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @MyCuppaJo: Sharing a second time today because I really like this paper and want someone else to read it so we can talk about it. "Neur…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @ROBERTO_COLOM: “Behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality”. https://t.co/2Fs8AYo27N
Couldn't agree more
RT @waterlego: "There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board with…
“Behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality”.
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/8fUyqSN4gy
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
@RayNorbury sounds interesting
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @KeithRoperDPT: Reductionism won't get us there... biologically or professionally. We need the Macro and the Micro, and we need inter-…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
"There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board without examination." -Daniel Dennett
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @KeithRoperDPT: Reductionism won't get us there... biologically or professionally. We need the Macro and the Micro, and we need inter-…
RT @KeithRoperDPT: Reductionism won't get us there... biologically or professionally. We need the Macro and the Micro, and we need inter-…
@m_wall This pretty much sounds like my advisor. We talk about this regularly. May not be exactly what you are looking for but check out this paper and references in there. https://t.co/K0m9X2amS2
Reductionism won't get us there... biologically or professionally. We need the Macro and the Micro, and we need inter-professional understanding and collaboration if we are to be better with this pain problem.
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
Thanks for sharing @MyCuppaJo. I'm adding to my reading list & think right up @jilly_bond #happybladder street (with cup of tea in hand) x
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
This is a great paper which should be read by everyone interested in cognition. We discussed this in our spring school 2018 @LangMusCog and will put emphasis on it again in our 2019 edition: Integrated approaches (based on Marr & Tinbergen)!
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
Without context we risk omphaloskepsis
Important, fundamental and interesting... 😉
RT @MohamedGhilan: “...in the case of the roundworm (C. elegans), we know the genome, the cell types, and the connectome—every cell and its…
RT @MohamedGhilan: “...in the case of the roundworm (C. elegans), we know the genome, the cell types, and the connectome—every cell and its…
RT @MohamedGhilan: “...in the case of the roundworm (C. elegans), we know the genome, the cell types, and the connectome—every cell and its…
RT @MohamedGhilan: “...in the case of the roundworm (C. elegans), we know the genome, the cell types, and the connectome—every cell and its…
“...in the case of the roundworm (C. elegans), we know the genome, the cell types, and the connectome—every cell and its connections... [But] our understanding of how all this structure maps onto the worm’s behavior remains frustratingly incomplete.” http
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
As ever, I feel sad that I have not done more philosophy (+ it's a great quote but for "philosophical" reasons I avoid all of the words mentioned; who/what gave me permission to consider my result "interesting"?)
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…
Yes!
RT @russpoldrack: Finally got around to reading this paper by @blamlab which is simply brilliant - should be required reading for anyone do…