RT @DoctorZen: @AcademicChatter 3. Look at PIs list of publications. Are they all "top tier" journals? Probably not. If so, ask why that is…
RT @DoctorZen: @AcademicChatter 3. Look at PIs list of publications. Are they all "top tier" journals? Probably not. If so, ask why that is…
@AcademicChatter 3. Look at PIs list of publications. Are they all "top tier" journals? Probably not. If so, ask why that is published where it is. 4. Unfortunately, some data support PI view that Impact factor is critical for students' prospective career
@GuertinLab There is some data from @LucasBCarey et al on the first question https://t.co/H80xZtMyC8
Came across this article about correlation between publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/xp69YCSNra
"Researchers, journals, and institutions are subjected to high-stakes quantification, from hiring to promotion and funding." https://t.co/mRwiyE2jw0 https://t.co/at4GYZdsst 14/25
@Sakiera_Hudson @PaoloAPalma @Ivuoma memory is part right, prestige matters (in this study), but so does publications and gender (in the expected direction for both) https://t.co/ieFMV9VOmK
7 yrs ago this paper reported being a women is a negative predictor for ‘PI’ position #womeninsciencestruggle (https://t.co/93RTs2JHjl) this recent paper is really beating around the bush...a great run away with a discriminatory conclusion statement. 👏
@samuelmehr @GordPennycook @DG_Rand @mjbsp @jayvanbavel @DunnHappyLab @profcikara @diegoareinero Not tweeting much today (holy moly this thread took off) but this gets a bit at what you’re asking. Both number of pubs and IF strongly associated with success
RT @FelipeIMerino: In summary promotion to PI depends on: number of papers and their impact factor, citations, gender and university rankin…
@CommunicatMind @acerbialberto There's this: Van Dijk, D., Manor, O., & Carey, L. B. (2014). Publication metrics and success on the academic job market. Current Biology, 24(11), R516-R517. https://t.co/S1iUBseqaB
@clairlemon @DORAssessment See, for example, this research on the structurally unequal factors that predict who gets promoted https://t.co/HYLPx7SmBf
RT @3RDuarte: Gender and the rank of a scientist's university "play a statistically significant role in the academic hiring process", which…
Gender and the rank of a scientist's university "play a statistically significant role in the academic hiring process", which is also mediated by the number of publications, their impact factor and number of citations. #whereisgenderequality https://t.co/
so that's how you do it!
RT @HKT52: PIになれる確率をデータドリブンに教えてくれるこれ面白いですね. Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/1oi6Xe24eM https://t.c…
RT @JWoodruffLab: What really matters for getting a faculty position? Here are the data, not just anecedotes. https://t.co/ubCV4jHMpT
RT @JWoodruffLab: What really matters for getting a faculty position? Here are the data, not just anecedotes. https://t.co/ubCV4jHMpT
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/2URh4f06eW
RT @FangChengYeh: Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/yARZplSTeI
Among >25,000 authors, first-author publications were strongest predictor of who becomes a "PI." Other predictors were journal impact factors, citations, and (very, very unfortunately) gender. Also raises many questions (eg what role does funding have?)
Very interesting. How to get a job in the academia!! Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/iGyQzuESHW
RT @MichiWagner4: Calculate the likelihood of becoming a PI - I hope it is not as simple..... Publication metrics and success on the acade…
RT @MichiWagner4: Calculate the likelihood of becoming a PI - I hope it is not as simple..... Publication metrics and success on the acade…
RT @rbhwilliams1: Fascinating analysis and depressingly predictable 'Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic…
RT @MichiWagner4: Calculate the likelihood of becoming a PI - I hope it is not as simple..... Publication metrics and success on the acade…
RT @MichiWagner4: Calculate the likelihood of becoming a PI - I hope it is not as simple..... Publication metrics and success on the acade…
RT @rbhwilliams1: Fascinating analysis and depressingly predictable 'Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic…
Important factors to consider... Or in other words, PUBLlSH!!! 😆
Fascinating analysis and depressingly predictable 'Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of publications, which may disincentivize rapid communication of findings, collaboration and in
Calculate the likelihood of becoming a PI - I hope it is not as simple..... Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/9VeiiNngS6
Publication metrics for becoming a PI. #hardlife https://t.co/a2LTeLzW6o
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/eq9m8E2gDA
RT @songhee_kim_: "We here use a machine-learning approach to predict who becomes a PI, [...] We show that success in academia is predictab…
RT @wustlcrm: Want to know your chance of becoming a PI? https://t.co/cVQGLEr6Aa
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2…
Study of 25K scientists shows that becoming a principal investigator can be predicted by no. of publications as 1st or 2nd author, h-index, and pubs in high impact factor journals. https://t.co/zEnk437OlI https://t.co/TLly9WzcgO
RT @JWoodruffLab: What really matters for getting a faculty position? Here are the data, not just anecedotes. https://t.co/ubCV4jHMpT
RT @KordingLab: "our model measures correlation, not causation. Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedi…
RT @KordingLab: "our model measures correlation, not causation. Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedi…
RT @KordingLab: "our model measures correlation, not causation. Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedi…
RT @KordingLab: "our model measures correlation, not causation. Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedi…
RT @jphysiol_eic: Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/fIZjjjbCNM. So many depressing conclusions. Hiri…
RT @KordingLab: "our model measures correlation, not causation. Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedi…
"our model measures correlation, not causation. Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of publications, which may dis-incentivize rapid communication ..." ? notCausality->Causality:
RT @VavvaP: Your future is basically defined at T0 of your academic career https://t.co/KVH2tHZi1b
RT @DrPerscitus: Publication metrics and success on the academic job market: Current Biology https://t.co/2Jv3qPgZBd
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market: Current Biology https://t.co/2Jv3qPgZBd
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market https://t.co/ngmUL8hXM0
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @MelissaRAndrews: Publication metrics and success on the academic job market...."Given the same publication record, men are more likely…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
Reaaaaaalllllly?!
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
RT @GappKatharina: Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.…
Never tell me the odds Science: ...
Not new but still shocking: "Given the same publication record, men are more likely than women to become PIs" https://t.co/M8MrLHNs6Z https://t.co/drvBCjePyj
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…
RT @nataliadutrapsy: Shocked. 👀 https://t.co/d1XlDYKxcl
RT @PsychoSchmitt: "Our results suggest that currently, journal impact factor and academic pedigree are rewarded over the quality of public…