↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Crystal Structure of an LSD-Bound Human Serotonin Receptor

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
877 Mendeley
Title
Crystal Structure of an LSD-Bound Human Serotonin Receptor
Published in
Cell, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Wacker, Sheng Wang, John D. McCorvy, Robin M. Betz, A.J. Venkatakrishnan, Anat Levit, Katherine Lansu, Zachary L. Schools, Tao Che, David E. Nichols, Brian K. Shoichet, Ron O. Dror, Bryan L. Roth

Abstract

The prototypical hallucinogen LSD acts via serotonin receptors, and here we describe the crystal structure of LSD in complex with the human serotonin receptor 5-HT2B. The complex reveals conformational rearrangements to accommodate LSD, providing a structural explanation for the conformational selectivity of LSD's key diethylamide moiety. LSD dissociates exceptionally slow from both 5-HT2BR and 5-HT2AR-a major target for its psychoactivity. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations suggest that LSD's slow binding kinetics may be due to a "lid" formed by extracellular loop 2 (EL2) at the entrance to the binding pocket. A mutation predicted to increase the mobility of this lid greatly accelerates LSD's binding kinetics and selectively dampens LSD-mediated β-arrestin2 recruitment. This study thus reveals an unexpected binding mode of LSD; illuminates key features of its kinetics, stereochemistry, and signaling; and provides a molecular explanation for LSD's actions at human serotonin receptors. PAPERCLIP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 312 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 877 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 856 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 207 24%
Researcher 128 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 14%
Student > Master 85 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 5%
Other 107 12%
Unknown 186 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 170 19%
Chemistry 105 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 96 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 10%
Neuroscience 77 9%
Other 135 15%
Unknown 203 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 865. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,091
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#156
of 17,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397
of 424,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#6
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.