The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Identification of Common Genetic Variants Influencing Spontaneous Dizygotic Twinning and Female Fertility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hamdi Mbarek, Stacy Steinberg, Dale R. Nyholt, Scott D. Gordon, Michael B. Miller, Allan F. McRae, Jouke Jan Hottenga, Felix R. Day, Gonneke Willemsen, Eco J. de Geus, Gareth E. Davies, Hilary C. Martin, Brenda W. Penninx, Rick Jansen, Kerrie McAloney, Jacqueline M. Vink, Jaakko Kaprio, Robert Plomin, Tim D. Spector, Patrik K. Magnusson, Bruno Reversade, R. Alan Harris, Kjersti Aagaard, Ragnar P. Kristjansson, Isleifur Olafsson, Gudmundur Ingi Eyjolfsson, Olof Sigurdardottir, William G. Iacono, Cornelis B. Lambalk, Grant W. Montgomery, Matt McGue, Ken K. Ong, John R.B. Perry, Nicholas G. Martin, Hreinn Stefánsson, Kari Stefánsson, Dorret I. Boomsma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Qatar | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 58% |
| Scientists | 25 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 24% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 13% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 760. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2024.
All research outputs
#27,662
of 26,544,375 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#10
of 6,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#437
of 314,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.