The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Leadership in Mammalian Societies: Emergence, Distribution, Power, and Payoff
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer E. Smith, Sergey Gavrilets, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Paul L. Hooper, Claire El Mouden, Daniel Nettle, Christoph Hauert, Kim Hill, Susan Perry, Anne E. Pusey, Mark van Vugt, Eric Alden Smith |
| Abstract |
Leadership is an active area of research in both the biological and social sciences. This review provides a transdisciplinary synthesis of biological and social-science views of leadership from an evolutionary perspective, and examines patterns of leadership in a set of small-scale human and non-human mammalian societies. We review empirical and theoretical work on leadership in four domains: movement, food acquisition, within-group conflict mediation, and between-group interactions. We categorize patterns of variation in leadership in five dimensions: distribution (across individuals), emergence (achieved versus inherited), power, relative payoff to leadership, and generality (across domains). We find that human leadership exhibits commonalities with and differences from the broader mammalian pattern, raising interesting theoretical and empirical issues. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| Spain | 6 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 311 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 15% |
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 31% |
| Psychology | 35 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#305,815
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#147
of 3,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,291
of 298,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.