Title |
Tornadic Storm Avoidance Behavior in Breeding Songbirds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.079 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henry M. Streby, Gunnar R. Kramer, Sean M. Peterson, Justin A. Lehman, David A. Buehler, David E. Andersen |
Abstract |
Migration is a common behavior used by animals of many taxa to occupy different habitats during different periods [1]. Migrant birds are categorized as either facultative (i.e., those that are forced to migrate by some proximal cue, often weather) or obligate (i.e., those that migrate on a regular cycle) [2, 3]. During migration, obligate migrants can curtail or delay flights in response to inclement weather or until favorable winds prevail [4, 5], and they can temporarily reorient or reverse direction when ecological or meteorological obstacles are encountered [6]. However, it is not known whether obligate migrants undertake facultative migrations and make large-scale movements in response to proximal cues outside of their regular migration periods [3]. Here, we present the first documentation of obligate long-distance migrant birds undertaking a facultative migration, wherein breeding golden-winged warblers (Vermivora chrysoptera) carrying light-level geolocators [7, 8] performed a >1,500 km 5-day circumvention of a severe tornadic storm. The birds evacuated their breeding territories >24 hr before the arrival of the storm and atmospheric variation associated with it. The probable cue, radiating >1,000 km from tornadic storms [9-11], perceived by birds and influencing bird behavior and movements [12-14], is infrasound (i.e., sound below the range of human hearing). With the predicted increase in severity and frequency of similar storms as anthropogenic climate change progresses [15], understanding large-scale behavioral responses of animals to such events will be an important objective of future research. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 30 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 13 | 10% |
Canada | 5 | 4% |
Japan | 4 | 3% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Finland | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Armenia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 60 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 93 | 71% |
Scientists | 33 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
Researcher | 23 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | <1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |