↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

A Paleozoic Stem Group to Mite Harvestmen Revealed through Integration of Phylogenetics and Development

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
21 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
A Paleozoic Stem Group to Mite Harvestmen Revealed through Integration of Phylogenetics and Development
Published in
Current Biology, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Russell J. Garwood, Prashant P. Sharma, Jason A. Dunlop, Gonzalo Giribet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 60 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 20%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 60%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 13%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#261,621
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,180
of 14,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,120
of 241,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#18
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.