Title |
A Paleozoic Stem Group to Mite Harvestmen Revealed through Integration of Phylogenetics and Development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.039 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Russell J. Garwood, Prashant P. Sharma, Jason A. Dunlop, Gonzalo Giribet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 23% |
Canada | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Argentina | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 60 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 20% |
Researcher | 13 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 60% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#261,621
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,180
of 14,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,120
of 241,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#18
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.