↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Epigenomics-Based Identification of Major Cell Identity Regulators within Heterogeneous Cell Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Epigenomics-Based Identification of Major Cell Identity Regulators within Heterogeneous Cell Populations
Published in
Cell Reports, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rizwan Rehimi, Milos Nikolic, Sara Cruz-Molina, Christina Tebartz, Peter Frommolt, Esther Mahabir, Mathieu Clément-Ziza, Alvaro Rada-Iglesias

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity within embryonic and adult tissues is involved in multiple biological and pathological processes. Here, we present a simple epigenomic strategy that allows the functional dissection of cellular heterogeneity. By integrating H3K27me3 chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data, we demonstrate that the presence of broad H3K27me3 domains at transcriptionally active genes reflects the heterogeneous expression of major cell identity regulators. Using dorsoventral patterning of the spinal neural tube as a model, the proposed approach successfully identifies the majority of previously known dorsoventral patterning transcription factors with high sensitivity and precision. Moreover, poorly characterized patterning regulators can be similarly predicted, as shown for ZNF488, which confers p1/p2 neural progenitor identity. Finally, we show that, as our strategy is based on universal chromatin features, it can be used to functionally dissect cellular heterogeneity within various organisms and tissues, thus illustrating its potential applicability to a broad range of biological and pathological contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,885,985
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#8,044
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,395
of 418,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#161
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.