| Title |
Recall of Others’ Actions after Incidental Encoding Reveals Episodic-like Memory in Dogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Fugazza, Ákos Pogány, Ádám Miklósi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 10% |
| Spain | 8 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 72% |
| Scientists | 19 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 167 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 23% |
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 27% |
| Psychology | 37 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1499. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,941
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#85
of 14,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121
of 416,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#3
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.