| Title |
“Singing” Fish Rely on Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin for the Timing of Nocturnal Courtship Vocalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ni Y. Feng, Andrew H. Bass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 117 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 370. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#85,185
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#532
of 14,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,844
of 328,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#10
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.