| Title |
Striking individual differences in color perception uncovered by ‘the dress’ photograph
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosa Lafer-Sousa, Katherine L. Hermann, Bevil R. Conway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
| Japan | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 64% |
| Scientists | 39 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 247 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 81 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 724. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#28,554
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#265
of 14,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227
of 279,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#5
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.