@OriKatz3 @yogevmh תיזהר. זו תאוריה שגויה. ראה המאמר של גרמי פוקס https://t.co/90QO49Mjxa
RT @marion_pfeifer: How many people today research to test it? How many teach it? As a concept it has outlived its usefulness. That does no…
How many people today research to test it? How many teach it? As a concept it has outlived its usefulness. That does not necessarily mean it hasn’t been useful in the past. Does that really count as zombie idea that is prevalent in ecology?
@larysar It really depends. For the simple model I presented it’s really not going to matter a lot; the time-avg stressor effect wil be key. Check this: https://t.co/EgZJjrCSfE
So...intermediate disturbance hypothesis is "wrong"? That's news to me... https://t.co/cnMajmVtbC Although it's a foundational paper according to this blog: https://t.co/uReCXfv8Vu The author of the blog, J. Fox, thinks we shouldn't be teaching it anymor
People who want to invoke IDH in 2016 should be prepared to argue pretty strongly why it should happen #zombieideas https://t.co/gjLqjMX2Gw
Trio: Adler 2011 https://t.co/j6sQ95M1VO Fox 2013 https://t.co/742d0k7gYi Huston 2014 https://t.co/9YTwJEuogX PRR/IDH/DEM #365papers (10-12)
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned: Trends in Ecology & Evolution http://t.co/lZJENQVids
#EminentEcologist Connell introd'd Intermediate Disturbance Hypoth http://t.co/ohiadusvw1 Now called a zombie idea http://t.co/ig2d0kqFtB
#EminentEcologist Connell introd'd Intermediate Disturbance Hypoth http://t.co/ohiadusvw1 Now called a zombie idea http://t.co/ig2d0kqFtB
@yamasa7 中規模撹乱仮説については最近TREEにJeremy Foxが「ゾンビ・アイデア」であるとして批判する論文を出している。 http://t.co/lEfqSgpR2R http://t.co/4woPw3ikpA
Effect of disturbance on ecol. div. hotly debated (eg http://t.co/23HScFbgJ0) - less so genetic div. New rev. on this http://t.co/78LNi3YIrF
Effect of disturbance on ecol. div. hotly debated (eg http://t.co/23HScFbgJ0) - less so genetic div. New rev. on this http://t.co/78LNi3YIrF
Effect of disturbance on ecol. div. hotly debated (eg http://t.co/23HScFbgJ0) - less so genetic div. New rev. on this http://t.co/78LNi3YIrF
Orig TREE op http://t.co/RlT2fqWUFG, response http://t.co/BQnnO42uQJ, response http://t.co/lFLImng71G, blog post: http://t.co/sMYbFPqjDg
@JohnFBruno @AbelValdivia I find Fox's argument to abandon the IDH compelling; do you anticipate strong rebuttals? http://t.co/8roR19wjoX
@savingspecies @Biology_Facts link to article: http://t.co/Si3gQzJDuu
"The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned" http://t.co/41OAQbAL9Y really? via @AbelValdivia
A new paper "The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned" by Fox 2003, http://t.co/PDL4FzFhNF
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned... http://t.co/ZQapiqbZ5Y
Read a refreshing paper by @DynamicEcology last night on why the intermediate disturbance hypothesis must be abandoned. http://t.co/reXrwtX9
Ecol txtbooks - "Rough things up a bit to increase diversity". But has intermediate disturbance hypothesis had its day? http://t.co/0l2Z5mVR
Ecol txtbooks - "Rough things up a bit to increase diversity". But has intermediate disturbance hypothesis had its day? http://t.co/0l2Z5mVR
BAM! The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned from @DynamicEcology http://t.co/C2NdHqJv
BAM! The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned from @DynamicEcology http://t.co/C2NdHqJv
BAM! The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned from @DynamicEcology http://t.co/C2NdHqJv
BAM! The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned from @DynamicEcology http://t.co/C2NdHqJv
Top story: http://t.co/ZpN3rH0F - Trends in Ecology & Evolution - The intermediate dis… http://t.co/NJaPMzDG, see more http://t.co/1HQeN47V
Love this: 'The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned' http://t.co/DCUwzzPN
RT @markus_eichhorn Is the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis dead? http://t.co/pc3E7BHm #paywall http://t.co/hAR2h0vM
Love this: 'The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned' http://t.co/DCUwzzPN
Abandoning the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, cool! http://t.co/LMJUIJi6
Abandoning the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, cool! http://t.co/LMJUIJi6
Love this: 'The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned' http://t.co/DCUwzzPN
Looks like a promising if disturbing paper"@markus_eichhorn: Is the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis dead? http://t.co/kLByTltm #paywall"
Fox: The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. TREE http://t.co/GWtArDHq thx to @markus_eichhorn
Fox: The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. TREE http://t.co/GWtArDHq thx to @markus_eichhorn
Is the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis dead? http://t.co/g45Ug4ij #paywall
Is the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis dead? http://t.co/g45Ug4ij #paywall
Fox J.W. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. http://t.co/Lt83WGCl
"The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned" http://t.co/TfOAD1bg (via @PaulRobbins15 )
Refutation of simple intermediate disturbance hypothesis not "coffin nail" for accepting disturbance. Its "complicated" http://t.co/Qqa9Eh0c
Jeremy Fox: "The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned" http://t.co/4MCEb5aX
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned... http://t.co/O5xNglPG
Un recuiente artículo en TREE propone abandonar la Teoría de la Perturbación Intermedia ¡Arrea!-> http://t.co/ExVHRVg9