| Title |
LTR-Retrotransposon Control by tRNA-Derived Small RNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea J. Schorn, Michael J. Gutbrod, Chantal LeBlanc, Rob Martienssen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 39% |
| France | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 52% |
| Scientists | 46 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 461 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 105 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 174 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Unknown | 90 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#373,793
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#2,003
of 17,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,717
of 331,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#44
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.