| Title |
The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent M. Reid, Kirsty Dunn, Robert J. Young, Johnson Amu, Tim Donovan, Nadja Reissland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 310 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| Japan | 12 | 4% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 198 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 253 | 82% |
| Scientists | 48 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 420 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 13% |
| Researcher | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 18% |
| Unknown | 93 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 171 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 44 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 11% |
| Unknown | 115 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1395. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#9,083
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#95
of 14,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138
of 332,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#2
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.