Title |
Widespread Biological Response to Rapid Warming on the Antarctic Peninsula
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew J. Amesbury, Thomas P. Roland, Jessica Royles, Dominic A. Hodgson, Peter Convey, Howard Griffiths, Dan J. Charman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 27 | 23% |
Chile | 18 | 15% |
United States | 6 | 5% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 46 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 96 | 80% |
Scientists | 19 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 19% |
Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 19% |
Unknown | 28 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 35 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,915
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#39
of 14,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 330,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#1
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.