↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Basal Ganglia Dysfunction Contributes to Physical Inactivity in Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
71 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
186 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
13 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Basal Ganglia Dysfunction Contributes to Physical Inactivity in Obesity
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle M. Friend, Kavya Devarakonda, Timothy J. O’Neal, Miguel Skirzewski, Ioannis Papazoglou, Alanna R. Kaplan, Jeih-San Liow, Juen Guo, Sushil G. Rane, Marcelo Rubinstein, Veronica A. Alvarez, Kevin D. Hall, Alexxai V. Kravitz

Abstract

Obesity is associated with physical inactivity, which exacerbates the health consequences of weight gain. However, the mechanisms that mediate this association are unknown. We hypothesized that deficits in dopamine signaling contribute to physical inactivity in obesity. To investigate this, we quantified multiple aspects of dopamine signaling in lean and obese mice. We found that D2-type receptor (D2R) binding in the striatum, but not D1-type receptor binding or dopamine levels, was reduced in obese mice. Genetically removing D2Rs from striatal medium spiny neurons was sufficient to reduce motor activity in lean mice, whereas restoring Gi signaling in these neurons increased activity in obese mice. Surprisingly, although mice with low D2Rs were less active, they were not more vulnerable to diet-induced weight gain than control mice. We conclude that deficits in striatal D2R signaling contribute to physical inactivity in obesity, but inactivity is more a consequence than a cause of obesity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 211 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 35 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 19%
Neuroscience 36 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 691. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#30,832
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#59
of 3,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#631
of 424,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.